Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss
This text of 639 F. App'x 181 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated cases, 'Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations to dismiss her claims after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgments. Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss, No. 3:15-cv-01784-TLW, 2015 WL 4487759 (D.S.C. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015); Assa’ad-Faltas v. Weiss, No. 3:15-cv-03186-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/assaad-faltas-v-weiss-ca4-2016.