Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss

639 F. App'x 181
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2016·No. Nos. 15-2075, 15-2458·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, 'Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations to dismiss her claims after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgments. Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss, No. 3:15-cv-01784-TLW, 2015 WL 4487759 (D.S.C. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015); Assa’ad-Faltas v. Weiss, No. 3:15-cv-03186-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss, 639 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2016).

639 F. App'x 181 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related