Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina

489 F. App'x 720
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2012·No. No. 12-1676·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006), as well as its orders denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, No. 3:11-cv-03077-TLW, 2012 WL 988083 (D.S.C. March 22, 2012; April 25, 2012; Aug. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, 489 F. App'x 720 (4th Cir. 2012).

489 F. App'x 720 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Stirling
D. South Carolina, 2025
Robinson v. Pintez
N.D. West Virginia, 2019