Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department

Fourth Circuit

Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department

572 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2014·No. Nos. 13-2175, 13-2413·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders adopting, in part, the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review, her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against defendants, its order denying her Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, and its order adopt[252] ing the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny her motion for injunctive relief. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district court’s orders. Assa’ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:13-cv01629-TLW, 2013 WL 5273823 (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2013; Oct. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders adopting, in part, the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review, her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against defendants, its order denying her Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, and its order adopt[252] ing the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny her motion for injunctive relief. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district court’s orders. Assa’ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:13-cv01629-TLW, 2013 WL 5273823 (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2013; Oct. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department, 572 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

572 F. App'x 251 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related