Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department

572 F. App'x 251
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 28, 2014
DocketNos. 13-2175, 13-2413
StatusPublished

This text of 572 F. App'x 251 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff's Department, 572 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders adopting, in part, the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review, her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against defendants, its order denying her Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, and its order adopt[252]*252ing the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny her motion for injunctive relief. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district court’s orders. Assa’ad-Faltas v. Richland County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:13-cv01629-TLW, 2013 WL 5273823 (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2013; Oct. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/assaad-faltas-v-richland-county-sheriffs-department-ca4-2014.