Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia

599 F. App'x 516
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2015·No. No. 14-2167·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against Defendants. We have limited our review to the issues raised in Assa’ad-Faltas’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b) and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’s motions for injunctive relief pending appeal and for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Assa’ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia, No. 3:14-cv-00298-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia, 599 F. App'x 516 (4th Cir. 2015).

599 F. App'x 516 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related