Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia
This text of 599 F. App'x 516 (Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against Defendants. We have limited our review to the issues raised in Assa’ad-Faltas’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b) and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa’ad-Faltas’s motions for injunctive relief pending appeal and for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Assa’ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia, No. 3:14-cv-00298-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/assaad-faltas-v-city-of-columbia-ca4-2015.