Aspry v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs

465 F. App'x 959
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2012
Docket2011-7137
StatusUnpublished

This text of 465 F. App'x 959 (Aspry v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aspry v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs, 465 F. App'x 959 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Aspry, Jr., appeals the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”), denying his claim based on hearing loss. Although Mr. Aspry frames the issue on appeal as whether the Veterans Court applied the correct legal standard, in effect he disagrees with the application of the “clear and unmistakable evidence” standard of 38 U.S.C. § 1111 to the facts of his case. We do not have jurisdiction to review the Veterans Court’s application of the law to the facts unless it presents a constitutional issue. Jackson v. Shinseki, 587 F.3d 1106, 1109 (Fed.Cir.2009); 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2); cf. Livingston v. Derwinski, 959 F.2d 224, 225 (Fed.Cir.1992) (“[T]he mere recitation of a basis for jurisdiction by either party or a court[ ] is not controlling; we must look to the true nature of the action.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss Mr. Aspry’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Costs

Each party shall bear its own costs.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. SHINSEKI
587 F.3d 1106 (Federal Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
465 F. App'x 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aspry-v-dept-of-veterans-affairs-cafc-2012.