Aspin v. Cornell
This text of 50 A. 63 (Aspin v. Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Brmghurst thereupon asked that a juror be withdrawn and that the plaintiff have leave to amend her declaration in conformity with the above facts.
We decline to withdraw a juror and amend the declaration. The case does not present such facts as would warrant us in granting your application.
The allegations of the declaration go to the damage of the persons in possession of the premises only, while the evidence shows the plaintiff not to be in possession of any part of the premises.
On the application of plaintiff’s counsel, the case is discontinued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A. 63, 19 Del. 33, 3 Penne. 33, 1900 Del. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aspin-v-cornell-delsuperct-1900.