Aspen Green v. City Of Tucson

234 F.3d 493, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9442, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30775
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 2000
Docket99-15625
StatusPublished

This text of 234 F.3d 493 (Aspen Green v. City Of Tucson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aspen Green v. City Of Tucson, 234 F.3d 493, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9442, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30775 (9th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

234 F.3d 493 (9th Cir. 2000)

ASPEN GREEN; NEALE ALLEN; JON MICHAEL; DORITA BRADY; WALLACE L. CRAIG; JUDY LESTER, Residents and Qualified Electors in Tortolita, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF TUCSON, an Arizona municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-15625

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date Filed: 11/30/00

D.C. No. CV-98-00443-TUC/RCC

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 F.3d 493, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9442, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aspen-green-v-city-of-tucson-ca9-2000.