Aslanian v. Island Planning Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aslanian v. Island Planning Corp.

170 A.D.2d 234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D.2d 234 (Aslanian v. Island Planning Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aslanian v. Island Planning Corp., 170 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, J.), entered December 19, 1989, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Not only did Griffiths allege that he was an "officer” or "agent” of defendant Island Planning Corporation of America, but defendants admitted that The Island Planning Group authorized Griffiths to use the title "Senior Vice President”. Questions of fact exist as to whether defendant Island Planning Corporation of American, acting under the trade name "The Island Planning Group”, is responsible as a principal for the alleged negligent acts of defendants Griffiths and Devine, as agents cloaked with, at the very least, apparent authority. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, J.), entered December 19, 1989, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Not only did Griffiths allege that he was an "officer” or "agent” of defendant Island Planning Corporation of America, but defendants admitted that The Island Planning Group authorized Griffiths to use the title "Senior Vice President”. Questions of fact exist as to whether defendant Island Planning Corporation of American, acting under the trade name "The Island Planning Group”, is responsible as a principal for the alleged negligent acts of defendants Griffiths and Devine, as agents cloaked with, at the very least, apparent authority. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D.2d 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aslanian-v-island-planning-corp-nyappdiv-1991.