Home/Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court/Askinas v. Goldman

Askinas v. Goldman

244 N.E.2d 731, 355 Mass. 792
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 244 N.E.2d 731 (Askinas v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Askinas v. Goldman, 244 N.E.2d 731, 355 Mass. 792 (Mass. 1969).

Opinion

This is a petition under G. L. c. 260, § 15, filed on December 26, 1967, to vacate a judgment of the Superior Court for the county of Suffolk entered on March 13,1967, in favor of the plaintiff (the respondent here) in an action of contract for legal services against the petitioner. The petitioner and his counsel are both from Springfield. The petition alleges .that the default was entered for failure of counsel to appear at the call of the conciliation list. The petition was denied and the petitioner excepted. There was no abuse of discretion.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Springfield Photo Mount Co. v. Kriensky
1984 Mass. App. Div. 3 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1984)
Jerry Martin Co. v. Hyannis Marina, Inc.
326 N.E.2d 914 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)
Maguire v. Quality Foreign Cars, Inc.
54 Mass. App. Dec. 76 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1974)
Askinas v. Goldman
298 F. Supp. 1217 (D. Massachusetts, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 N.E.2d 731, 355 Mass. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/askinas-v-goldman-mass-1969.