Askew v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Askew v. State

233 S.W.3d 771, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2007 WL 2769495

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 25, 2007

DocketED 89152

StatusPublished

This text of 233 S.W.3d 771 (Askew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Askew v. State, 233 S.W.3d 771, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2007 WL 2769495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Askew (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion, because he received ineffective assistance from his probation revocation counsel.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Askew (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion, because he received ineffective assistance from his probation revocation counsel.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 S.W.3d 771, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2007 WL 2769495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/askew-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack