Askew v. State

954 So. 2d 749, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6617, 2007 WL 1264067
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2007·No. No. 4D06-73·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state acknowledges that Appellant’s sentence as to count II must be vacated because he was not on probation on that count. We reverse and remand for modification accordingly. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GUNTHER, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Askew v. State, 954 So. 2d 749, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6617, 2007 WL 1264067 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 749 (Askew v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.