Asif Said v. Azhar Said and Phoenician Imports, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 30, 2008
Docket01-06-00763-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Asif Said v. Azhar Said and Phoenician Imports, Inc. (Asif Said v. Azhar Said and Phoenician Imports, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Asif Said v. Azhar Said and Phoenician Imports, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Opinion issued December 30, 2008





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas





NO. 01-06-00763-CV





ASIF SAID, Appellant


V.


AZHAR SAID AND PHOENICIAN IMPORTS, INC., Appellees





On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-34130





MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

          Appellees Azhar Said and Phoenician Imports have filed a motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration. Azhar and Phoenician Imports have not filed a motion to recall this Court’s mandate, which the Clerk issued on May 3, 2007, pursuant to our opinion.

          Azhar and Phoenician claim in their motion that our holding— that preserving the status quo by temporary injunction requires that both brothers be allowed to derive their incomes from the business—somehow violates the employment-at-will doctrine. In making that argument, Azhar and Phoenician assume that Asif Said is an employee, rather than an owner who works in the business.

          The issue of the ownership of Phoenician Imports, however, is one that will ultimately be decided as part of the permanent injunction proceedings. Until the ownership of Phoenician Imports is adjudicated, Asif has a right to earn a livelihood that should be protected, if possible, by the courts. See Byers v. Trans-Pecos Abstract Co., 18 S.W.2d 1096, 1098 (Tex. Civ. App.—El Paso 1929, writ dism’d).

          We deny the motion for rehearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.3. Further, the en banc court did not vote to reconsider, and en banc reconsideration is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.7.

                                                             Sam Nuchia

                                                             Justice

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Keyes, and Higley.

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Taft, Nuchia, Jennings, Keyes, Alcala, Hanks, Higley, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byers v. Trans-Pecos Abstract Co.
18 S.W.2d 1096 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Asif Said v. Azhar Said and Phoenician Imports, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asif-said-v-azhar-said-and-phoenician-imports-inc-texapp-2008.