Asif, Mohammad Munir v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 2003
Docket14-02-00548-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Asif, Mohammad Munir v. State (Asif, Mohammad Munir v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Asif, Mohammad Munir v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed March 6, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed March 6, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-00548-CR

MOHAMMAD MUNIR ASIF, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 647,161

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

Appellant pled guilty to the offense of sexual assault of a child on February 12, 1993.  In accordance with a plea bargain, appellant was sentenced on February 12, 1993, to confinement for 10 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.  On September 11, 2001, appellant filed a motion for DNA testing.  On April 8, 2002, the trial court denied appellant=s motion and adopted the State=s proposed findings of fact, including the finding that no evidence was tagged in appellant=s case that could be tested.


Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  No pro se response has been filed. 

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed March 6, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Asif, Mohammad Munir v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asif-mohammad-munir-v-state-texapp-2003.