Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen

Fourth Circuit

Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen

320 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2009·No. No. 08-1957·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Garrett Cunneen and Storm Jenkins appeal the district court’s order granting Asia Apparel’s motion to dismiss specified claims without prejudice and for summary judgment of claims remaining. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen, No. 3:02-cv-00469-GCM, 2008 WL 2949244 (W.D.N.C. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Garrett Cunneen and Storm Jenkins appeal the district court’s order granting Asia Apparel’s motion to dismiss specified claims without prejudice and for summary judgment of claims remaining. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen, No. 3:02-cv-00469-GCM, 2008 WL 2949244 (W.D.N.C. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen, 320 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

320 F. App'x 159 (Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.