Ashworth v. Wrigley

1 Hall 145
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedOctober 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Hall 145 (Ashworth v. Wrigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashworth v. Wrigley, 1 Hall 145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion must prevail as a matter of course, and is always granted by the Supreme Court in like cases. The only doubt originates in the defendant’s offer, to waive Ms discharge : but it does not appear, that he has any defence to the action, except as to its form. The court will not,' therefore, drive the plaintiff to the expense of a litigation, which can never draw in question the real merits between the parties. - ’

Motion granted

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wenzel v. Murphy
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 262 (New York Marine Court, 1876)
Honeywell v. Burns
8 Cow. 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hall 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashworth-v-wrigley-nysuperctnyc-1828.