Ashworth v. Wrigley

1 Hall 145
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided October 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion must prevail as a matter of course, and is always granted by the Supreme Court in like cases. The only doubt originates in the defendant’s offer, to waive Ms discharge : but it does not appear, that he has any defence to the action, except as to its form. The court will not,' therefore, drive the plaintiff to the expense of a litigation, which can never draw in question the real merits between the parties. - ’

Motion granted

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashworth v. Wrigley, 1 Hall 145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

1 Hall 145 (Ashworth v. Wrigley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wenzel v. Murphy
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 262 (New York Marine Court, 1876)
Honeywell v. Burns
8 Cow. 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)