Ashurst v. Dixie Block Coal Company

20 S.W.2d 1011, 230 Ky. 812, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 189
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedOctober 11, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 S.W.2d 1011 (Ashurst v. Dixie Block Coal Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashurst v. Dixie Block Coal Company, 20 S.W.2d 1011, 230 Ky. 812, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 189 (Ky. 1929).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Eeversiug.

A demurrer was sustained to the petition of Ashurst by the trial court, and he appeals. In his petition he alleged the Dixie Block Coal Company (a Kentucky corporation) had wrongfully entered on his land and mined and removed therefrom coal worth $5,250. He alleged that after that was done, Pearl Warren and three others, the stockholders of the corporation, had caused it to sell all its property and divide the proceeds among them.He joined these stockholders as defendants, asked for judgment for his claim, etc.,

The defendants moved the court to require plaintiff to elect whether he would prosecute his cause of action against the corporation or against the individual defendants. They also filed a general demurrer to the petition. The court sustained the motion to elect, the plaintiff declined to elect, whereupon the court sustained the demurrer to the petition, the plaintiff declined to amend, aiid the-court dismissed his petition.

*813 The petition, though not in the best of form, did state a cause of action, and when the plaintiff declined to elect, the court should have stricken out his cause of action against the individual defendants. See section 85 of Civil Code of Practice. This should be stricken without prejudice, as the plaintiff may desire to renew that action after his controversy with the corporation is concluded.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noel v. Head
264 S.W.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1954)
Rose v. Sprague
59 S.W.2d 554 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.W.2d 1011, 230 Ky. 812, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashurst-v-dixie-block-coal-company-kyctapphigh-1929.