Ashton v. Heydenfeldt

56 P. 1031, 6 Cal. Unrep. 279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ashton v. Heydenfeldt. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Cal. 14
California Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 1899·No. S. F. No. 1266·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondents move to amend the judgment rendered, which directs that the demurrer to the complaint be overruled, by adding thereto a direction that respondents be allowed to answer; but this direction is not necessary, because the court below, if a proper showing be made, will undoubtedly allow the respondents to answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashton v. Heydenfeldt, 56 P. 1031, 6 Cal. Unrep. 279 (Cal. 1899).

56 P. 1031 (Ashton v. Heydenfeldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.