Ashok Rana, AKA Rajput Sunil-Kumar v. Robert Moschorak, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization Service

Ninth Circuit

Ashok Rana, AKA Rajput Sunil-Kumar v. Robert Moschorak, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization Service

37 F.3d 1506, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36378, 1994 WL 568016

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 14, 1994·No. 93-56389·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

37 F.3d 1506
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Ashok RANA, aka Rajput Sunil-Kumar, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Robert MOSCHORAK, District Director, and Immigration and
Naturalization Service, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 93-56389.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1994.
Decided Oct. 14, 1994.

Before: FLETCHER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK,* District Judge.

ORDER

This appeal is dismissed. We remand to the district court with direction to vacate its Order Remanding to Board of Immigration Appeals. The district court is directed to grant or deny the writ of habeas corpus based on the record before it. See DeBrown v. Department of Justice, 18 F.3d 774 (9th Cir.1994).

*

Honorable John W. Sedwick, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1506
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Ashok RANA, aka Rajput Sunil-Kumar, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Robert MOSCHORAK, District Director, and Immigration and
Naturalization Service, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 93-56389.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1994.
Decided Oct. 14, 1994.

Before: FLETCHER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK,* District Judge.

ORDER

This appeal is dismissed. We remand to the district court with direction to vacate its Order Remanding to Board of Immigration Appeals. The district court is directed to grant or deny the writ of habeas corpus based on the record before it. See DeBrown v. Department of Justice, 18 F.3d 774 (9th Cir.1994).

*

Honorable John W. Sedwick, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation

Ashok Rana, AKA Rajput Sunil-Kumar v. Robert Moschorak, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization Service, 37 F.3d 1506, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36378, 1994 WL 568016 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

37 F.3d 1506 (Ashok Rana, AKA Rajput Sunil-Kumar v. Robert Moschorak, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related