Ashmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

542 So. 2d 201, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 698, 1989 WL 37018
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 19, 1989
DocketNo. 87-1404
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 542 So. 2d 201 (Ashmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 542 So. 2d 201, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 698, 1989 WL 37018 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

FORET, Judge.

This is a personal injury action filed by Faron Ashmore against Lonnie Price and his liability insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of defendants, dismissing all of plaintiffs demands, and plaintiff has appealed.

FACTS

The accident in question occurred on August 5, 1986, as plaintiff was backing his Ford pickup truck out of a parking slot located in the King’s Country Shopping (enter in Pineville, Louisiana. Defendant’s vehicle had just made a left turn in the shopping center parking lot and was proceeding north in search of a parking slot when his vehicle struck plaintiff's truck which had just emerged from the second parking slot located to defendant’s left (see sketch attached).

The witnesses’ testimony is conflicting as to the direction of plaintiffs truck (as he backed out of the parking slot) as well as the point of impact (in plaintiff or defendant’s travel lane). The trial court stated that he found the testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses conflicting and therefore, unbelievable. Conversely, he found the testimony of Mr. and Mrs. Price, indicating that plaintiff suddenly and unexpectedly pulled out in front of defendant’s vehicle resulting in a collision in defendant’s lane of traffic, to be credible. We find no manifest error in the trial court’s finding of fact and therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff, Faron P. Ashmore.

AFFIRMED.

[203]*203[[Image here]]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
546 So. 2d 1215 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 201, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 698, 1989 WL 37018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashmore-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-lactapp-1989.