Ashmore v. Cook

Fourth Circuit

Ashmore v. Cook

585 F. App'x 189

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1665

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 189 (Ashmore v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ashmore v. Cook, 585 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Feleicia Cook appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.CivP. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order granting summary judgment to the Plaintiff. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ashmore v. Cook, No. 3:13-cv-01449-MBS (D.S.C. June 24, 2014). We grant Cook leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Feleicia Cook appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.CivP. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order granting summary judgment to the Plaintiff. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ashmore v. Cook, No. 3:13-cv-01449-MBS (D.S.C. June 24, 2014). We grant Cook leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashmore-v-cook-ca4-2014.