ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided April 3, 2023·No. 5:22-cv-00214·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

JUSTIN SINCLAIR ASHLEY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 5:22-cv-214-MTT-CHW : WELLMAKER, et al., : : Defendants. : :

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the Clerk to provide him with a copy his complaint in this action. (Doc. 22). Plaintiff’s request for his complaint is GRANTED. Although Plaintiff does not have a right to free copies of his own court documents, Jackson v. Fla. Dep’t of Fin. Servs., 479 F. App’x 289, 292–93 (2012), Plaintiff’s request is granted in an abundance of caution. The document requested is only 12 pages long, and the cost to the Court is minimal. However, Plaintiff is advised to keep his own copies of future filings. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of his complaint, Document 1, with this Order. SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of April, 2023.

s/ Charles H. Weigle_________ Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER, (M.D. Ga. 2023).

ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER (ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Florida Department of Financial Services
479 F. App'x 289 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)