ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER
This text of ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER (ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
JUSTIN SINCLAIR ASHLEY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 5:22-cv-214-MTT-CHW : WELLMAKER, et al., : : Defendants. : :
ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the Clerk to provide him with a copy his complaint in this action. (Doc. 22). Plaintiff’s request for his complaint is GRANTED. Although Plaintiff does not have a right to free copies of his own court documents, Jackson v. Fla. Dep’t of Fin. Servs., 479 F. App’x 289, 292–93 (2012), Plaintiff’s request is granted in an abundance of caution. The document requested is only 12 pages long, and the cost to the Court is minimal. However, Plaintiff is advised to keep his own copies of future filings. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of his complaint, Document 1, with this Order. SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of April, 2023.
s/ Charles H. Weigle_________ Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ASHLEY v. WELLMAKER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-wellmaker-gamd-2023.