Ashley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ashley v. State

1913 OK CR 234, 132 P. 1191, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 28, 1913

DocketNo. A-1652.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 234 (Ashley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ashley v. State, 1913 OK CR 234, 132 P. 1191, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Ashley, plaintiff in error, was convicted of unlawfully selling one pint of whisky to G. W. Davis on or about December 2nd, 1911. On January 20th, 1912, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of six months and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. An appeal was perfected by filing in this *739 court, March 16th, 1912, a petition, in error with ease-made. No brief has been filed. No testimony was offered in behalf of the defendant as against the proof on the part of the state that the sale was made ■as alleged. We have examined the record and find no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment., It is therefore affirmed. ¡Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Ashley, plaintiff in error, was convicted of unlawfully selling one pint of whisky to G. W. Davis on or about December 2nd, 1911. On January 20th, 1912, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of six months and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. An appeal was perfected by filing in this *739 court, March 16th, 1912, a petition, in error with ease-made. No brief has been filed. No testimony was offered in behalf of the defendant as against the proof on the part of the state that the sale was made ■as alleged. We have examined the record and find no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment., It is therefore affirmed. ¡Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 234, 132 P. 1191, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.