Ashley v. Southwest Florida Insurance Associates, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ashley v. Southwest Florida Insurance Associates, Inc.

685 So. 2d 854, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616, 1995 WL 700370

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 29, 1995

DocketNo. 95-02283

StatusPublished

This text of 685 So. 2d 854 (Ashley v. Southwest Florida Insurance Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ashley v. Southwest Florida Insurance Associates, Inc., 685 So. 2d 854, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616, 1995 WL 700370 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kathleen J. Ashley appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee found that appellant was discharged for misconduct connected with work. This finding of fact was adopted by the Unemployment Appeals Commission. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. We find no legal error and appellant failed to show that the finding of disqualification for unemployment compensation benefits was not supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, we affirm the determination of the commission that appellant is not eligible for unemployment benefits. See Beard v. Dep’t of Commerce, 369 So.2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

THREADGILL, C.J., and FRANK and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kathleen J. Ashley appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee found that appellant was discharged for misconduct connected with work. This finding of fact was adopted by the Unemployment Appeals Commission. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. We find no legal error and appellant failed to show that the finding of disqualification for unemployment compensation benefits was not supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, we affirm the determination of the commission that appellant is not eligible for unemployment benefits. See Beard v. Dep’t of Commerce, 369 So.2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

THREADGILL, C.J., and FRANK and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 854, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616, 1995 WL 700370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-southwest-florida-insurance-associates-inc-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack