Ashley v. Singletary

706 So. 2d 1373, 1998 WL 60416
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 1998
Docket97-1203
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 1373 (Ashley v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashley v. Singletary, 706 So. 2d 1373, 1998 WL 60416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

706 So.2d 1373 (1998)

James D. ASHLEY, Appellant,
v.
Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 97-1203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 17, 1998.
Rehearing Denied March 24, 1998.

James D. Ashley, Pro Se.

Maryellen McDonald, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

KUDER, Associate Judge.

As appellant did not file his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus or Alternatively Writ of Mandamus in the proper county, the circuit court properly denied his petition. See § 79.09, Fla. Stat. ("Before a circuit judge the [habeas corpus] petition and the papers shall be filed with the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained...."); Alachua Regional Juvenile Detention Ctr. v. T.O., 684 So.2d 814, 816 (Fla.1996) ("If a prisoner files a habeas corpus *1374 petition in circuit court, the petition must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained."); Lewis v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 697 So.2d 965, 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) ("As long as appellant is incarcerated in the Tenth Judicial Circuit, only a court in that circuit has the power to entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and therefore is the only court with territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of his claim."); Searcy v. Singletary, 590 So.2d 1034, 1034 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) ("Mandamus in the circuit court where the prisoner is housed is the proper remedy to compel the award of gain-time."). Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court's order without prejudice to appellant's right to file a petition for appropriate relief in the proper court. See Bush v. State, 545 So.2d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stovall v. Cooper
860 So. 2d 5 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Miller v. Moore
767 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Alday v. Singletary
719 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 1373, 1998 WL 60416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1998.