Ashley v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ashley v. Singletary

664 So. 2d 318, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12665, 1995 WL 723548

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 8, 1995

DocketNo. 95-961

StatusPublished

This text of 664 So. 2d 318 (Ashley v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ashley v. Singletary, 664 So. 2d 318, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12665, 1995 WL 723548 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order is reversed and the cause remanded for issuance of an order to show cause on the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant has demonstrated that he exhausted his administrative remedies, therefore denial of the petition on that basis was error. Appellant also presented evidence on the issue of the origin of the alleged contraband items. The record before this court fails to include a statement of the former employee of the Department of Corrections which was evidently relied upon to determine appellant’s guilt at the disciplinary proceeding. The final order is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

JOANOS, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final order is reversed and the cause remanded for issuance of an order to show cause on the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant has demonstrated that he exhausted his administrative remedies, therefore denial of the petition on that basis was error. Appellant also presented evidence on the issue of the origin of the alleged contraband items. The record before this court fails to include a statement of the former employee of the Department of Corrections which was evidently relied upon to determine appellant’s guilt at the disciplinary proceeding. The final order is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

JOANOS, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 So. 2d 318, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12665, 1995 WL 723548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1995.