Ashley v. Howard

24 S.E. 875, 99 Ga. 132
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 1, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 875 (Ashley v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashley v. Howard, 24 S.E. 875, 99 Ga. 132 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. The bill of exceptions having been filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court on the first day of August, 1895, and it affirmatively appearing from the certificate of that clerk that one of the attorneys for the plaintiff in error, upon the day of such filing, took the bill of exceptions from the office of the clerk below and kept the same until the 3d of October, 1895, thus preventing the clerk from transmitting the same together with the transcript of the record to, this court within the time prescribed by law, the writ of error must be dismissed. Code, §§4272d, 4272e; Farrar v. Oglesby, 84 Ga. 188.

2. The correctness of the clerk’s certificate connot be called in question by the voluntary affidavits of counsel filed in this court,

TYrit of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. Mayor of Athens
143 S.E.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Hames v. Weekes
141 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Budden v. Brooks
51 S.E. 727 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 875, 99 Ga. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-howard-ga-1896.