Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 21-2203
ASHLEY POPA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant
v.
HARRIET CARTER GIFTS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; NAVISTONE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 2-19-cv-00450) District Judge: Honorable William S. Stickman, IV
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
____________________
Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellee is granted in part. The panel has
determined that the original decision should be upheld but has revised the opinion to
clarify issues raised in appellee’s petition for rehearing. Accordingly, it is hereby
Judge Fuentes’ vote is limited to panel rehearing only. ORDERED that the opinion filed on August 16, 2022, is hereby vacated and amended
opinion shall be filed simultaneously with this order. The revised opinion does not alter
the August 16, 2022, judgment.
The amended opinion has been circulated to the en banc court in accordance with
3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.5.7. The majority of the judges of the circuit in regular active service
having not voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
By the Court,
s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge
Dated: October 18, 2022 Lmr/cc: All Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc. (Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.