Ashley Huber v. CIR

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2026·No. 25-3073·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 25-3073

Ashley M. Huber

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant

v.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee

Appeal from The United States Tax Court

Submitted: May 26, 2026 Filed: May 29, 2026 [Unpublished]

Before LOKEN, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ashley Huber appeals after the tax court1 sustained the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s calculation of her tax deficiency and penalty, following a trial in her action challenging a notice of deficiency. Upon careful review, we conclude the

1 The Honorable Ronald L. Buch, United States Tax Court Judge.

tax court did not err in sustaining the notice of deficiency, including the substantialunderstatement penalty assessed against Huber. See Campbell v. Comm’r, 164 F.3d 1140, 1142 (8th Cir. 1999) (tax court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error and its legal conclusions are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashley Huber v. CIR, (8th Cir. 2026).

Ashley Huber v. CIR (Ashley Huber v. CIR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related