Ashley Huber v. CIR
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 25-3073
Ashley M. Huber
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee
Appeal from The United States Tax Court
Submitted: May 26, 2026 Filed: May 29, 2026 [Unpublished]
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Ashley Huber appeals after the tax court1 sustained the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s calculation of her tax deficiency and penalty, following a trial in her action challenging a notice of deficiency. Upon careful review, we conclude the
1 The Honorable Ronald L. Buch, United States Tax Court Judge.
tax court did not err in sustaining the notice of deficiency, including the substantialunderstatement penalty assessed against Huber. See Campbell v. Comm’r, 164 F.3d 1140, 1142 (8th Cir. 1999) (tax court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error and its legal conclusions are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ashley Huber v. CIR (Ashley Huber v. CIR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.