Ashley Danielle Siebert v. State
Opinion
Order entered July 9, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01386-CR
ASHLEY DANIELLE SIEBERT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA16-59378-G
ORDER We REINSTATE the appeal.
By order entered April 18, 2019, the Court ordered the trial court to prepare and file
findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the trial court’s October 30, 2018 rulings on
appellant’s motions to suppress evidence and late-tendered evidence. While the case has been
abated, four supplemental clerk’s records have been filed reflecting an ongoing dispute between
appellant and the trial court regarding the adequacy and sufficiency of the trial court’s findings
and conclusions.
Although the trial court has not entered a document styled formally as findings and
conclusions, it has filed a June 7, 2019 document styled “Trial Court’s First Response to
[Appellant’s] Due Process Request Pertaining to Filing of Requested Findings and Conclusions” in which it points to oral findings and conclusions on the record and a “Trial Court’s Second
Response to [Appellant’s] Due Process Request Pertaining to Filing of Requested Findings and
Conclusions and [Appellant’s] Objection to Trial Court’s June 7 Ruling” in which it provides
more formal written findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding appellant’s motion to
suppress evidence.
We conclude the trial court has complied with the Court’s order. Any dispute about the
adequacy of the trial court’s findings and conclusions may be addressed in the parties’ briefs.
We ORDER appellant to file her brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ashley Danielle Siebert v. State (Ashley Danielle Siebert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.