Ashley Coslett v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 19, 2022·No. 05-22-00173-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered August 19, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00173-CR

ASHLEY COSLETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-80156-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 17, 2022 fourth motion for an

extension of time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make

appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant

desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent,

whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall

conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the

trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure

effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which

shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above

order. The appeal shall be reinstated when the findings are received or at such

other time as the Court deems appropriate.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashley Coslett v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Ashley Coslett v. the State of Texas (Ashley Coslett v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)