Ashkenazi v. Hertz Rent-A-Car
This text of 4 A.D.3d 317 (Ashkenazi v. Hertz Rent-A-Car) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated November 14, 2002, which denied, without prejudice, its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, made prior to conducting depositions, was properly denied without prejudice (see CPLR 3212 [f]; Elson v Defren, 283 AD2d 109, 117 [2001]). Santucci, J.E, Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.3d 317, 770 N.Y.S.2d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashkenazi-v-hertz-rent-a-car-nyappdiv-2004.