ASHING v. State
This text of 353 S.W.3d 475 (ASHING v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Mary Ashing appeals the judgment of the motion court denying her Rule 24.035 motions for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. She sought to vacate her concurrent sentences of six and five years imprisonment for two first-degree statutory rape convictions. Ashing contends that counsel was ineffective during sentencing when she failed to inform the court that she was ineligible for placement in the section 559.115 shock incarceration program and to offer alternatives to that program. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 S.W.3d 475, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2011 WL 6258462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashing-v-state-moctapp-2011.