Ashil USA Holdings Corp. v. Avram Cimerring
This text of 273 A.D.2d 41 (Ashil USA Holdings Corp. v. Avram Cimerring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered June 2, 1999, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to vacate the parties’ settlement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
It is well established that “[o]nly where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident, will a party be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation” (Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230; see also, King v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 267 AD2d 48; Matter of Kanter, 209 AD2d 365), and here the record discloses no such ground to excuse defendants from complying with the subject stipulation of settlement, which they entered into in open court after ample consultation with their counsel.
We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D.2d 41, 708 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashil-usa-holdings-corp-v-avram-cimerring-nyappdiv-2000.