Asheville Times Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Asheville Times Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263

121 S.E. 37, 187 N.C. 157, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 247

DecidedJanuary 22, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 37 (Asheville Times Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asheville Times Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263, 121 S.E. 37, 187 N.C. 157, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 247 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Clarkson, J.

For the reasons given in the case of The Citizens Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263, Frank J. Torlay, and others, the judgment of the court below dissolving the restraining order against the Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263, is affirmed. As against the individuals set out in the complaint, the judgment is reversed and modified in accordance with that opinion.

The restraining order under the judgment of the court below is continued against the individual defendants to the hearing and modified in accordance with that opinion.

Affirmed as to the Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263.

Beversed and modified as to the individuals, Frank J. Torlay and others.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarkson, J.

For the reasons given in the case of The Citizens Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263, Frank J. Torlay, and others, the judgment of the court below dissolving the restraining order against the Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263, is affirmed. As against the individuals set out in the complaint, the judgment is reversed and modified in accordance with that opinion.

The restraining order under the judgment of the court below is continued against the individual defendants to the hearing and modified in accordance with that opinion.

Affirmed as to the Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263.

Beversed and modified as to the individuals, Frank J. Torlay and others.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 S.E. 37, 187 N.C. 157, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asheville-times-co-v-asheville-typographical-union-no-263-nc-1924.