Asheroff v. Teachers' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Asheroff v. Teachers' Retirement System

39 A.D.2d 872, 334 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4248

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 872 (Asheroff v. Teachers' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asheroff v. Teachers' Retirement System, 39 A.D.2d 872, 334 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 16, 1972, which, in part, directed that respondent conduct hearings pursuant to subdivisions 5 and 7 of section 2573 of the Education Law, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking therefrom the third and fourth decretal paragraphs which pertain to such hearings and so much of the fifth paragraph referring to such hearings, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The diverse issues raised by petitioner in her present article 78 proceeding are either premature or, as to those properly before the court, have already been determined adversely to her in a prior proceeding brought by her pursuant to article 78, in the Supreme Court, Kings County. (Matter of Asheroff v. Board of Educ., N. Y. L. J., June 18, 1969, p. 19, col. 4, affd. 33 A D 2d 992, affd. 29 N Y 2d 538.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., MeCivern, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 16, 1972, which, in part, directed that respondent conduct hearings pursuant to subdivisions 5 and 7 of section 2573 of the Education Law, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking therefrom the third and fourth decretal paragraphs which pertain to such hearings and so much of the fifth paragraph referring to such hearings, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The diverse issues raised by petitioner in her present article 78 proceeding are either premature or, as to those properly before the court, have already been determined adversely to her in a prior proceeding brought by her pursuant to article 78, in the Supreme Court, Kings County. (Matter of Asheroff v. Board of Educ., N. Y. L. J., June 18, 1969, p. 19, col. 4, affd. 33 A D 2d 992, affd. 29 N Y 2d 538.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., MeCivern, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 872, 334 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asheroff-v-teachers-retirement-system-nyappdiv-1972.