Asher v. State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Asher v. State Board of Parole

786 P.2d 1323, 100 Or. App. 592, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 161

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 21, 1990

DocketCA A60194

StatusPublished

This text of 786 P.2d 1323 (Asher v. State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asher v. State Board of Parole, 786 P.2d 1323, 100 Or. App. 592, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 161 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order that revoked his parole. He contends that, at the time of the Board’s action, he was no longer on parole, because his “good time” release date had passed. However a prisoner does not accumulate good time while on parole, and the original good time release date is suspended. Ventris v. Maass, 99 Or App 85, 781 P2d 1224 (1989), rev den 309 Or 231 (1990).

Petitioner also contends that the Board improperly denied his request for appointed counsel for the revocation hearing. Petitioner never denied that he violated the conditions of parole or presented any reason justifying appointment of counsel. The Board did not err in denying his request. ORS 144.343(3) (f).

Petitioner’s remaining contention does not warrant discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI