Ashby v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ashby v. State

1926 OK CR 75, 243 P. 1003, 33 Okla. Crim. 297, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 72

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 6, 1926

DocketNo. A-5308.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1926 OK CR 75 (Ashby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ashby v. State, 1926 OK CR 75, 243 P. 1003, 33 Okla. Crim. 297, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 72 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BESSEY, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, Tom Ashby, and *298 John Williams were jointly charged with the illegal possession of whisky. Williams was acquitted; Ashby was found guilty with his punishment assessed at confinement in jail for 30 days and a fine of $50.

Ashby claims that the evidence adduced was procured by an unauthorized search and seizure. If it was in fact so obtained, the objection to its use against him came too late, and the right to have the evidence excluded was waived. Gore v. State, 24 Okla. Cr. 394, 218 P. 545; Martin v. State, 29 Okla. Cr. 136, 232 P. 966.

Moreover, there was evidence tending to show that this offense, or a portion of it, was committed in the presence of the officers, before the search and seizure took place. If so, the arrest without a warrant of arrest, and the search and seizure incident thereto^ were legal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI