Ashby v. Glasgow

7 Mo. 320
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 7 Mo. 320 (Ashby v. Glasgow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashby v. Glasgow, 7 Mo. 320 (Mo. 1842).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court, delivered by

Scott, Judge.

Glasgow, and others, sued Ashby by petition in debt, on a note for seventy-four dollars and fifty-seven cents; judgment was recovered for the amount cf the note, with damages and costs. At a subsequent term of the court, a motion was made to set aside the judgment for costs entered against the defendant below, which motion was oveiruled. This is the errror assigned, for which a reversal of the judg- . mentis sought.

When a final judgment is- rendered in a cause, and that judgment is erroneous, it may, during the term at which it was rendered, be set aside for during a term all the pro-cee¿iugs are in the breast of. the court, and they may be altered or vacated as justice requires. , But when the term is Past> then the control of the court ceases, and no alteration amendment can be made,-but such as is authorised by the A statute of jeofails .and amendments. An error m the court, in rendering judgment, is not cured by the statute of jeofails, it can only be.corrected by appeal, or writ of error, But as the whole-record ismo.w before the court, and as.it aPPears ^iat cause was properly cognizable, before a justice of the-peace, the suit'haying been commenced before . amendatory .of .the.act, regulating justices courts, , approved February 16th, L841, judgment for costs,should . haye been entered against the plaintiff;.below. .Sep4th geo... [321]*3211st article of the act concerning justices’ courts, 346. The judgment of the circuit court, as to costs, is reversed, directions to enter a judgment for costs against the plaintiff', and the cause remanded.

Where a suit, properly cognizable before a justice of the peace, is commenced in the circuit court, judgment for costs should he rendered against the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donnell v. Vigus Quarries, Inc.
457 S.W.2d 249 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1970)
State Ex Rel. Maple v. Mulloy
15 S.W.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1929)
Woodward v. Woodward
84 Mo. App. 328 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
Wyler v. Union Pacific Ry. Co.
89 F. 41 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1898)
Clowser v. Noland
72 Mo. App. 217 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Hall v. Lane
27 S.W. 546 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
State ex rel. Klotz v. Ross
23 S.W. 196 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Martin v. St. Charles Tobacco Co.
53 Mo. App. 655 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Mann v. Warner
22 Mo. App. 577 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Megher v. Stewart
6 Mo. App. 498 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1879)
Weil v. Simmons
66 Mo. 617 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)
Wilson v. Boughton
50 Mo. 17 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)
Downing v. Still
43 Mo. 309 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1869)
Harbor v. Pacific Railroad
32 Mo. 423 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1862)
Williams v. Judge of the Cooper Court of Common Pleas
27 Mo. 225 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1858)
Brewer v. Dinwiddie
25 Mo. 351 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1857)
The Illinois
12 F. Cas. 1170 (D. Michigan, 1857)
Hill v. City of St. Louis
20 Mo. 584 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Mo. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashby-v-glasgow-mo-1842.