Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc.
This text of 144 F. App'x 625 (Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment. The district court ruled that under the Fair Credit Reporting Act “the entity contracting with [626]*626the policyholder is the only statutory ‘taker’ of adverse action” in cases in which it is alleged that an increased charge is contained in a policy of insurance. It also held that “internal decisions” that lead to an increase cannot constitute adverse actions. In light of Edo v. GEICO Casualty Co., — F.3d-, No. 04-35279, 2005 WL 2416126 (9th Cir.2005), we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 F. App'x 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashby-v-farmers-group-inc-ca9-2005.