Ashann-Ra v. Johnson
88 F. App'x 664
Opinion
Ashann-Ra appeals the district court’s order denying his free exercise claim filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Ashann-Ra v. Johnson, No. CA-02-927-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ashann-Ra v. Johnson, 88 F. App'x 664 (4th Cir. 2004).
88 F. App'x 664 (Ashann-Ra v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983