Asha v. Goldsten
140 F.2d 702, 78 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 14, 1944·No. No. 8456·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The sole ground of appeal is an alleged error of the court below in instructing the jury. Appellant made no objection to the instruction at the trial and, therefore, under Rule 51 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the judgment will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asha v. Goldsten, 140 F.2d 702, 78 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019 (D.C. Cir. 1944).
140 F.2d 702 (Asha v. Goldsten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Fries v. David
105 A.2d 746 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1954)
Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.
61 A.2d 624 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1948)