Asha v. Goldsten
140 F.2d 702, 78 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 1944
DocketNo. 8456
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 140 F.2d 702 (Asha v. Goldsten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Asha v. Goldsten, 140 F.2d 702, 78 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019 (D.C. Cir. 1944).
Opinion
The sole ground of appeal is an alleged error of the court below in instructing the jury. Appellant made no objection to the instruction at the trial and, therefore, under Rule 51 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the judgment will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
De Fries v. David
105 A.2d 746 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1954)
Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.
61 A.2d 624 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 F.2d 702, 78 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asha-v-goldsten-cadc-1944.