Ash v. State

555 So. 2d 453, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1990 WL 3653
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 18, 1990
DocketNo. 89-321
StatusPublished

This text of 555 So. 2d 453 (Ash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ash v. State, 555 So. 2d 453, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1990 WL 3653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

We affirm the departure sentence in this case. However, we reverse the imposition of court costs and remand with directions [454]*454that the trial court afford appellant notice and opportunity to object to the imposition of the costs. See Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Shipley v. State
528 So. 2d 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 So. 2d 453, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1990 WL 3653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ash-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.