Ash v. State

555 So. 2d 453, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1990 WL 3653
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 1990·No. No. 89-321·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

We affirm the departure sentence in this case. However, we reverse the imposition of court costs and remand with directions [454] that the trial court afford appellant notice and opportunity to object to the imposition of the costs. See Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ash v. State, 555 So. 2d 453, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1990 WL 3653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

555 So. 2d 453 (Ash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Shipley v. State
528 So. 2d 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)