Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer, D/B/A Deebee's

989 F.2d 478
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 29, 1993·No. 92-1048·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the APPELLEE, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing in banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, and if is further

ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.

The mandate of the court will issue on April 2, 1993.

Chief Judge NIES, Circuit Judge NEWMAN, Circuit Judge ARCHER, Circuit Judge MICHEL and Circuit Judge PLAGER would rehear the appeal in banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer, D/B/A Deebee's, 989 F.2d 478 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

989 F.2d 478 (Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer, D/B/A Deebee's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asgrow Seed Co. v. Winterboer
513 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Correll v. State
639 N.E.2d 677 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)