ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States

610 F.2d 785, 67 C.C.P.A. 31, 1979 CCPA LEXIS 168
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided November 29, 1979·No. C.A.D. 1238·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 82 Cust. Ct. 61, C.D. 4788 (1979), which upheld the decision of the Secretary of the Treasury that float glass manufactured in Great Britain did not benefit from the payment or bestowal of a bounty or grant within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1303). For the same reasons set forth in the opinion in ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States, No. 79-15, decided concurrently herewith, the judgment of the Customs Court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Market, Chief Judge, and Rich, Judge, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States, 610 F.2d 785, 67 C.C.P.A. 31, 1979 CCPA LEXIS 168 (ccpa 1979).

610 F.2d 785 (ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Steel Corp. v. United States
566 F. Supp. 1529 (Court of International Trade, 1983)
Carlisle Tire and Rubber Co. v. United States
564 F. Supp. 834 (Court of International Trade, 1983)