Asesoral Business Partners, LLC v. Seatech Worldwide Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 19, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-11512·Unknown

Opinion

PRIEI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . □ fi □□ | I □

Asesoral Business Partners, LLC, Ube DEC 19 □□□□ | Plaintiff, □□□□ 19-cv-11512 (AJN) —-V— ORDER Seatech Worldwide Corporation, et al., Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The limited subject matter jurisdiction of a district court is best addressed at the outset of

a case, Courts have an independent obligation to determine whether subject matter jurisdiction exists, Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 501 (2006). Plaintiff Asesoral Business Partners, LLC brings this action invoking the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship. It alleges that it is a business corporation, authorized and existing under the laws of Delaware and having its principal place of business in Wilmington, Delaware, and that Defendants are two domestic business corporations existing under the law of and having their principal places of business in New York, as well as

an individual who resides in New York. See Dkt. No. 1 5-8. “For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.” Strother v. Harte, 171 F. Supp. 2d 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). A complaint premised on diversity of citizenship must therefore allege the citizenship of natural

persons and corporations that are members of a limited liability company. See Handelsman v. Bedford Vill, Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Cosgrove v.

Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Within twenty days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall amend its Complaint to allege the citizenship of each constituent person or entity comprising Asesoral Business Partners, LLC

(including the state of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entity member). If, by the foregoing date, Plaintiff is unable to amend to truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship, then the Complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice to any party.

Dated: December (7. 2019 New York, New York \, | ! 4 ALISON J. NATHAN ~ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asesoral Business Partners, LLC v. Seatech Worldwide Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Asesoral Business Partners, LLC v. Seatech Worldwide Corporation (Asesoral Business Partners, LLC v. Seatech Worldwide Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.
546 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Strother v. Harte
171 F. Supp. 2d 203 (S.D. New York, 2001)