Asemani v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2009·No. 09-6167·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6167

BILLY G. ASEMANI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

S. SMITH, Case Management Specialist; TYLER, Captain, Mailroom Supervisor; KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, ECI-East; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-02952-RDB)

Submitted: May 18, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district courts denial of

his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006) action alleging denial of access to courts. We

review the denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of

discretion. See Pacific Ins. Co. v. American Nat’l Fire Ins.

Co., 148 F.3d 396, 402 (4th Cir. 1998). After reviewing the

record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Asemani’s motion for reconsideration.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions

are adequately expressed in the materials before the court and

further argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asemani v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2009).

Asemani v. Smith (Asemani v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related