Asemani v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6167
BILLY G. ASEMANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S. SMITH, Case Management Specialist; TYLER, Captain, Mailroom Supervisor; KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, ECI-East; STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-02952-RDB)
Submitted: May 18, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Billy G. Asemani appeals the district courts denial of
his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) action alleging denial of access to courts. We
review the denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of
discretion. See Pacific Ins. Co. v. American Nat’l Fire Ins.
Co., 148 F.3d 396, 402 (4th Cir. 1998). After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying Asemani’s motion for reconsideration.
Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We
dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions
are adequately expressed in the materials before the court and
further argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asemani v. Smith (Asemani v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.