Asemani v. Napolitano

Fourth Circuit

Asemani v. Napolitano

402 F. App'x 766

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2010·No. No. 10-6718·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his request for adjudication of his naturalization application. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Asemani v. Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01029-RDB (D.Md. May 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his request for adjudication of his naturalization application. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Asemani v. Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01029-RDB (D.Md. May 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Asemani v. Napolitano, 402 F. App'x 766 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

402 F. App'x 766 (Asemani v. Napolitano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.