Asemani v. Green
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7925
BILLY G. ASEMANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, ECI-E; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, Division of Corrections (“D.O.C.”); GARY MAYNARD, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; BRATTEN, Ms., Health Administrator ECI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03397-RDB)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Asemani v. Green, No. 1:08-cv-03397-RDB (D. Md. Sept.
30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asemani v. Green (Asemani v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.