Asemani v. Fisher

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 29, 2009
• Docket: 09-6097
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6097

BILLY G. ASEMANI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOIS I. FISHER, Chief Attorney; NANCY S. FORSTER, Chief Public Defender; COLLATERAL REVIEW DIVISION OF THE OPD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03272-RDB)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order

dismissing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action complaining that

Defendants will not authorize funds to pay for an expert witness

that Asemani deems essential to his state post-conviction case.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Asemani v. Fisher, No. 1:08-cv-03272-RDB (D. Md. filed

Dec. 15, 2008, entered Dec. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED