Asemani v. Chronister
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7865
BILLY G. ASEMANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. CHRONISTER, Corrections Officer, Eastern Correctional Institution-East ("ECI-E"); MS. PARKS, Correctional Officer, ECI-E; MS. JOSEPH, Sergeant, ECI-E; MR. WEBSTER, Lieutenant, ECI-E, in their individual and official capacities; OFFICER DAVIS; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00238-RDB)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 22, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Billy G. Asemani, a frequent filer, appeals the
district court’s order granting summary judgment to the
Defendants on Asemani’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Asemani v. Chronister, No. 1:09-cv-00238-RDB (D. Md.
Sept. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asemani v. Chronister (Asemani v. Chronister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.