Asemani v. Chronister

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 2010·No. 097865·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7865

BILLY G. ASEMANI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. CHRONISTER, Corrections Officer, Eastern Correctional Institution-East ("ECI-E"); MS. PARKS, Correctional Officer, ECI-E; MS. JOSEPH, Sergeant, ECI-E; MR. WEBSTER, Lieutenant, ECI-E, in their individual and official capacities; OFFICER DAVIS; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00238-RDB)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 22, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani, a frequent filer, appeals the

district court’s order granting summary judgment to the

Defendants on Asemani’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Asemani v. Chronister, No. 1:09-cv-00238-RDB (D. Md.

Sept. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asemani v. Chronister, (4th Cir. 2010).

Asemani v. Chronister (Asemani v. Chronister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related